Odd the phrase “what we are told to feel about motherhood” or so it seemed to me, when reading an article about books on early motherhood. I don’t remember ever being told what to feel about motherhood, or deciding to give it any proper thought myself. As a child, sometimes, I had imagined myself as a mother, as most girls do I suppose, not in any concrete way but rather as an emulation of my own mother. As a young woman, the idea became very distant; I was too busy learning, working, falling in love – just thinking about other things. Holding other people’s babies, I never toyed with the idea of them being my own.
Then came that moment on the doctor’s bed. “Look, there, you can see the two heartbeats,” she said. Those home pregnancy tests, though leg jittering and exhilarating, had not seemed very real. Laying prostrate, neck craning to see the unintelligible blur of the ultrasound image and mind sluggish in that oppressive, sanitised heat of doctors’ surgeries, I experienced my first maternal flash – a fearful image of a child with two hearts, “What does that mean?” I asked concerned. “That you’re having twins.” The relief was immense, “Oh goody,” I chirped, “All’s okay then.” What was it I felt? A sudden and instinctive sense of devotion and responsibility.
For those long months that followed, as my belly got bigger and heavier, drifting floor-wards with distinct limbs protruding towards the end, my maternal attitude remained quite static. I was protective: crisscrossing lanes in the local swimming pool to avoid the flailing arms and legs of neighbouring bodies. And I was devoted: eating carefully to provide enough of the good stuff, and conscientiously attending all prescribed medical appointments and still arranging a few more, despite my aversion to those dry, white waiting rooms. I was proud, too: smiling smugly when the gynaecologist told me our unborn daughter had long legs, and letting friends place their hands on me to feel those writhing tots inside.
By static, though, I mean that my idea did not (and could not) develop much beyond this waiting game of pregnancy – enough of a preoccupation in itself. My thoughts were mostly with my own body working hard to grow those children. How I would feel about them as individuals in the future, apart from a vague notion of loving them, and how I would feel about myself as a mother, were impossible to tell. The children’s presence was an abstract concept, made only slightly more tangible by the folded up pram and the two gleaming white cots in our spare room. Looking back, some of these practical preparations were momentary insights: I was sure I wanted us to have slings to carry the children in, breastfeeding was a must, and the thought of them sleeping in one bed at first was rather sweet. Still, this was no grand maternal theory at work, just certain aspects of life with little babies which seemed important.
Perhaps other expectant mothers read lots of baby books. I didn’t. Seizing the moment of precious quiet, I read the types of books I was always meaning to read but never quite finding the time – history, philosophy, gorgeous, weighty fiction. The one baby book – pastel fronted and brimming with photos of smiling infants – lay untouched until close to the end when I dutifully got on with reading it, only to forget everything it advised by the time the children arrived. When they finally did, the excitement of meeting them, tempered by that post-natal extreme fatigue, was enough to prevent any conscious deliberation about what I should be feeling about motherhood and how this compared to what, if anything, I had been previously told. A subconscious choice – instincts seemed easier and more realistic than the prolonged thought of soul-searching.
Now – the children nearly two – I have more time and that delirious tiredness has become a distant memory, marked only by the dark shadows under our eyes in those early photos. I suppose I do think more about motherhood and me, but rarely in terms of how I expected myself to be. There is no sense of comparison, nor of set standards here. Rather, I find myself continually surprised by the strength of my feelings, though fluid and specific to the situation, the power of instincts and the ease with which most maternal decisions come.
It is perhaps for these reasons, that I was caught off guard by the journalist’s phrase. It implied an existing consciousness and a set of absorbed cultural norms, uniform and dogmatic, which women are somehow drilled to believe prior to bearing children. It also presented “motherhood” as quite distinct, separate from anything else we might experience or set out to achieve. In doing so, it left no room for the individual, or for intuition. And therein lay a danger: that we are making too much out of all of this, creating something of a cult of motherhood – with huge expectations, frustration at any limitations and a desire for perfect infants. You see, we are told to feel all sorts of things at various stages in our life, but no one insists or expects you to faithfully believe them. What about what we are told to feel about love? You could say that “what feels right” is simply a product of everything we have previously been told to feel, but that seems a bit paranoid, simplistic and counter-intuitive to me.