The sacrifice?

‘Sacrifice’ is the word Rebecca Asher uses in her book, ‘Shattered: Modern Motherhood and The Illusion of Equality’, to describe the burden of childcare and responsibility for domestic equilibrium still shouldered disproportionately by mothers, even those who return to full time work. She also talks about the ‘narrow world’ of childrearing which comes as such a shock in the midst of an exciting career and stands in stark contrast to the outside life fathers continue to lead. 

I only read a short extract, but the timing was fitting.  For many of the mothers I know, whose babies will soon celebrate their first birthday, the end of paid maternity leave and the return to work are round the corner. And though they must find somewhere to put the baby, for most, this cannot come soon enough. They, too, talk of feeling constrained by the limited life they lead at home with their babies and look forward to resuming partial pre-baby lives. The only regret tinging these conversations is the hassle of arranging childcare, especially something long enough and close enough to home to enable them to be in the office on time. There is often a hint of worry that their careers may have been impeded by this last year off or that having a sick child, which will keep them at home for the odd day or two, will impede their careers in the future. The sacrifice of the last year has been made – more would be unwelcome. No one is planning to stay at home, even for another few months. 

My situation is slightly different, having moved countries whilst pregnant and with no fixed job to which I must return. Still, it is easy to be caught up in this frenetic atmosphere; I have plenty of ideas of things I would like to do, freelance or otherwise, and a many a lead to follow. I, too, am seduced by the prospect of life beyond the babies and the smart work clothes hanging untouched in my wardrobe. Despite this, that there is no marked day when I must whisk myself off to an office for 9 hours, perhaps grants me a different perspective. 

Loathe as I am to be branded a wannabe 1950s housewife, catapulting rogue dirty nappies into the post-feminist battlefield, I am struck by the language we use to describe staying at home with children – even for a relatively short time. ‘Sacrifice’ and ‘narrow world’ seem a reflection of contemporary views towards full time parenthood. What about the sacrifice we make by feeling compelled back to work when our children are so small, for fear if we do not go right there and then, we will have no prospect of a career at all. This seems to me a far greater sacrifice. My past professional experience suggested that there is always an ‘incredibly exciting project’ in which to get involved – no matter the day, month or year. Children are small and terribly dependent only once in their lifetime. Looking at a long career, children are small for a comparatively short period of time. And though the office world may be broader in some respects, life at home with children can be just as varied and enriching, if not more so, if only you can bring yourself to acknowledge it. 

I am also struck by the contrast between the compulsion to return to work and the intensity and vigour with which many of these women have embraced motherhood the last 12 months – expensive prams, the finest organic baby clothes, little pots of sweet potato puree tucked into their designer nappy bags, from baby yoga to nursery rhymes a baby-focused activity each weekday. Some of this intensity brings a real pleasure to what could be a rather wearing and dreary few months, but it also becomes a project unto itself – propelling you in a tired whirl of baby courses when you could be enjoying a stroll around the park or sitting in the sun on a bench reading a good book. Fashionable, it seems, is to be the model of extremely dedicated motherhood for a year and then return to your model career when your time is done. 

Is our desire for equality in career opportunities and domestic duties hampered by our conventional ideas of success? We wait to have children until we are sure we can successfully slot back into an ambitious career path and afford the childcare that enables it. We wait to have children until we have the financial means to buy all the trimmings of model parenthood. We wait to have children until we are at the peak of our careers and feel compelled to work as soon as is acceptable. Maybe we should all throw caution to the wind, not worry too much about how our children will fit with our ideal career paths and then start recognising the beauty of both: the unique time of being at home with babies when they really need us and the joy of focusing on work when they can do without us for a few hours a day. The more women and men who do this, the more common and acceptable it will be to work less than 50 hours a week and still have an interesting job. Less sacrifice and more straightforward enjoyment of worlds broad and narrow! 

 

Those moments

I woke up yesterday with sunlight streaming through the window onto the face of the sleeping baby beside me. The spring sun was lovely, but the baby was magical. For the last ten months, the babies have woken us up. This time, I woke up first. Perhaps it was the combination of the reasonable hour to be waking up and my biased mother’s eyes, but his little face was truly as sweet and round as a freshly-podded pea. This is a moment to treasure, I thought to myself, carefully stirring in bed so as not to wake him.

This morning I caught the other baby pushing herself backwards from all fours to sitting; something I knew she could do – she had secretly manoeuvred herself from tummy to upright the day before – but had not yet seen in action. It was so wonderfully exciting to see her understanding how to use her strength and coordination to such good use. How we cheered and clapped when she succeeded. I made another mental note.

I suppose we could be trying to capture these remarkable moments on video. Perhaps I should for their future interest, but I have no real desire for myself. No, these are the moments to be stored up in one’s mind for long family dinners or for idle hours on a park bench or for when my children have children and I start telling them all about how it was when they were young.

Hopes glimmering and dashed

I sat in the sunshine outside our local bakery the other day, babies sleeping in the pram, when the man on the bench beside me told me he also had twins. They are now three, nearly four he told me, and oh what a joy they bring. The sight of him filled me with optimism; he seemed so relaxed and happy, eating his piece of cake on a spring-filled Sunday morning, no children in tow. Then we started talking about nights, foolishly perhaps on my side. No, they still don’t sleep well, I heard with horror. One wakes up and then the other one and they almost always end up in their parents’ beds. What, I thought indignant, I am sure I was promised all of this sleep deprivation would have faded into a distant memory by then.

That’s the thing when you starting talking to parents of older children. The conversations often provide some initial reassurance and then almost always seed some grain of doubt. My first experience of this was when talking to the mother of twins, eight months older than our two. She told me the first two months had been really difficult, but then they had this miraculous turning point when everything seemed to slot into place. Ten minutes later she remarked that the second afternoon of our acquaintance (when I was still pregnant and her babies were around four months old) was one of the most stressful she had ever lived through. Hmmm, not quite the turning point she had promised then. A few months later, I was walking in the park with another mother of twins, when we bumped into yet another of our type walking in the opposite direction. My immediate companion had just been telling me how she found life got much easier once her babies hit four months. But my hopes were then dashed by the next mother (her big eleven month old boys chewing on bread and sitting jolly in their pram), as she flashed me a sympathetic look and said, “the first nine months are ever so hard.”

The trick of self-preservation must be to stop believing everything you hear. It could be that there is no particularly easy phase with children, but also, in general, only a few fleeting moments when it is desperately hard. Then again, I always feel slightly smug when I look at younger babies, and think to myself – ooh, how nice to be through that phase. So perhaps it is getting easier. And, my optimism usually quickly returns when I tell myself these children are not our children, and ours , of course, will be very different.

The hassle pleasure equation

We like to think of ourselves as adventurous parents, having undertaken all sorts of things the more risk adverse would not dare to do in the first year of their children’s lives. So it is not easy for us to admit a growing list of activities, to which we now hesitate to the point of inertia before agreeing, and includes baby swimming, playgroups and meeting friends with other children at play cafes. Sad to say, through a process of trial and error, we have discovered that these said activities leave us feeling all worn out for a very small amount of pleasure in return. Put simply, they are more hassle than they are worth. Our most recent of these experiences – our first family trip to the local swimming pool – perhaps shows why.

An expedition only possible because we had a friend staying for the weekend, we thought, rashly, that the adult to baby ratio (3:2) would be sufficient to make the whole trip a breeze. We had decided to take a taxi. Parking nearby would be too difficult and we did not want to take the pram nor carry the babies a long distance in the cold. A very big taxi: swimming gear for five certainly mounts up. So there we were in our very big taxi with our two babies, two baby car seats, three bags of swimming gear and three adults and now needed to get into the pool. It turns out swimming pool buildings are much warmer than it is outside at the moment. We did not have much fun carting our loot from the taxi into the changing rooms in our winter coats, nor did we have much fun realising we would have to try and store the two baby car seats in the swimming lockers whilst putting the babies somewhere else, they in their winter coats (snowsuits). But at some point we took off our coats and came up with the cunning plan to take the babies in the car seats to the edge of the pool. We also discovered the changing tables round the corner and managed to unpeel rosy cheeked babies down to swimming nappies, carefully pulled on before we set off from home. That was when the adventure blossomed into its brief moment of pleasure. Warm water, bright faces, glittering eyes, big splashes and raucous laughter – everything you expect from a happy first swimming trip. Oh, we did enjoy those full fifteen minutes. Then it was back off to the overheated changing rooms, back to balancing babies precariously on changing tables whilst attempting to get changed ourselves, the nasty surprise that we had got the car seats all wet in the process, carrying everything outside again, and waiting for another very big taxi. You might say, for want of better taste, an interactive map short of a military operation.

We could strive to refine our approach. A few tweaks (such as walking there with the pram, or wearing easier clothes ourselves) and an additional adult and I think we could have the whole affair down to something manageable. Same with playgroups and play cafes. We could, and we would be back in the adventurous parent gang. Call me a spoil sport, but anything that involves removing and pulling back on two snow suits, when it is not in our own home, is just not worth it to me for the next month. Roll on spring, say the babies.